Browser Download For Android Mobile

Aaqib de Barabba | Jul 21, 2017

 

It’s that time again. It’s now been a full six months since our last browser comparison , so you’re probably eagerly awaiting our latest half-yearly report on the four most popular Android browsers at the moment: Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, UC Browser, and Opera. As on previous occasions our comparison covers several aspects: RAM use, app opening speed, and compatibility.This an excellent thing for their fans, which means that they can experience the new feature of browser for android mobile in the near future. Moreover, this new feature will certainly bring new changes to our lives. It can not exactly know what this change is for now, but the time will tell.

 

Many people start using this product from an early time and learn about most of its features. This new updates still catches up public’s eyes and causes a great concern.In the interest of contrasting today’s analysis with our previous ones, we’re going to be using the same test device as we used a year ago – a Google Nexus 7 (2013) with Android 6.0.1 – while the versions for each browser are the latest ones to date released on the stable channel: Google Chrome 56.0.2924.87,Firefox 52.0, Opera 42.6.2246.114522, and UC Browser 11.2.5.932. We’ll be looking at: how much memory the app takes up after its installation, opening time after successive iterations, RAM consumed when running, performance based on several benchmarks, and an admittedly subjective but still important evaluation of usability. The intrinsic capabilities of each app fall beyond the scope of this analysis, as this sort of data can be easily consulted on each developer’s website.

Memory space

 We also found this interesting thing.How much space an app takes up is a super important thing to keep in mind given how limited so many devices are in this respect. We’re going to consider the size of the APK before a clean installation and the app itself afterward, plus the amount of data used after doing all the tests below.The new feature is closer to the user’s daily need and public’s lives. In recent years, some products similar to browsers android continue to appear. The new thoughts will expended to other areas for better public’s service.

  • Google Chrome: 78.76MB App + 23MB of data (44.83MB in the APK)
  • Opera Browser: 78.07MB + 1.82MB of data (59.42MB in the APK)
  • Mozilla Firefox: 53.04 + 24MB of data (32.23MB in the APK)
  • UC Browser: 63.74MB + 22.27MB of data (17.29MB in the APK)

Opening time

Another important thing to keep in mind is how long it takes a browser to open. To measure this indicator we’ve used the free Android app DiscoMark, which gauges how long it takes a set of apps to open by taking the average time from several iterations. This time we’ve opted to do 25 opening cycles to get a measure that’s as close as possible to the normal situation where the content being accessed is already resident in the browser memory. The results are as follows:

Google Chrome: 0.469s

Opera Browser: 0.506s

Mozilla Firefox: 0.326s

UC Browser: 0.553s

 

 

RAM consumption

Don’t be fooled: the amount of space occupied by an app is not the same as the memory used by the associated running processes and the cache generated for the optimum functioning of the app in question. We’ve taken our data here straight from Android’s own app manager and included all open elements for each one. More specifically, we opened the browser with three tabs immediately after a clean startup of the device: the Uptodown homepage, Wikipedia, and a blank Google search tab. Plus to contrast that info we use the useful app Simple System Monitor which lets us keep a monitor window open in real time while we open the aforementioned browser tabs.

  • Google Chrome: 87+36=123MB in memory | 136+45=181MB when running
  • Mozilla Firefox: 32MB in memory | 203MB when running
  • Opera: 0MB in memory | 81+150+83+51+68+49+31=512MB when running
  • UC Browser: 45+48=93MB in memory | 194+50+50=294MB when running

 

Conclusions

As in previous comparisons, the crown is still bitterly disputed between the top two contenders, but this time we’ve seen that Mozilla Firefox is a step ahead in terms of both speed and optimization of resource consumption. Opera continues to live in its own parallel world where the best product is its Mini version, while UC Browser is basically a residual product that’s still drunk on the elaborateness of unnecessary content. Chrome is the only one giving Firefox a decent challenge, though it’s got a lot of ground to cover. We have yet to see, however, if it makes a great leap forward with its upcoming version 57 on the stable channel, with the promised reduction in memory use.More data and information of browser can be found in the recent posts. New information will continue to be released. Keep an eye on our site and get the real-time updates and other latest information.